Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Materiality (interior design)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  10:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Materiality (interior design)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a pretty awful article that I came to via the wikify tag. The more I look at it, the more I conclude that this is not an encyclopaedic, notable topic. Books with 'materiality' in their titles do exist, but they deal with architectural design and are therefore better covered in Materiality (architecture). I suggest this article be deleted and any salvageable content be merged with that article. Mcewan (talk) 11:00, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:29, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:29, 30 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete in this instance (I have more time for Materiality (architecture) because, at least, it is a term/quality that has been specifically written about in numerous books). 'Materiality' means 'of materials' or 'quality' and certainly is a buzzword used by architects and designers. But this article is bordering on being essay-like, constructed using sources that aren't specifically about materiality and interior design. Sionk (talk) 00:48, 1 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.