Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matha Ayurveda Eye Hospital


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 07:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Matha Ayurveda Eye Hospital

 * – ( View AfD View log )

An alternative medicine organisation, with no remarkable achievement or coverage to merit an article on Wikipedia. Lacks significant coverage in third party media. The sourcing (all primary) does not rise to the standard set by WP:ORGCRIT. In addition, due to the nature of the organization, WP:FRINGE and WP:MEDRS are relevant, and there need to be strong sources than what is available to allow articles on this topic. PROD was removed. Walrus Ji (talk) 07:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Walrus Ji (talk) 07:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Walrus Ji (talk) 07:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Walrus Ji (talk) 07:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 16:50, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The nominator has it right. In addition, the sourcing includes an article published in "An International Quarterly Journal of Research in Ayurveda", which fails WP:MEDRS by a wide, wide margin. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 17:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. BD2412  T 22:40, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks significant coverage in media. Kryzaal (talk) 12:55, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * delete per Kolma8, and BD2412. —usernamekiran (talk) 18:34, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:09, 6 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator, although carrying out important work have been unable to find anything that makes it wikisignificant. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.