Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathematics and Informatics Quarterly (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 16:21, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Mathematics and Informatics Quarterly
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No independent sources (actually, cannot even find a real homepage), does not seem to be indexed in any bibliographic database. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. (Note: The article was apparently recreated 2 or 3 weeks after deletion at the previous AFD by a now-blocked user. However, G5 was denied because article is sufficiently different from version that was deleted after the previous AFD). Randykitty (talk) 12:00, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 12:02, 4 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as it stands. I declined speedy as it seemed to me sufficiently different to the previous version (which RK couldn't see, of course - always a problem with G4). One difference was that there were references. Having looked into these, I cannot say that they do anything for me in the way of establishing notability. Either non-independent (the 'olympiads' one), just a mention (the IMTS one) or simply not accessible (the Google Books one, which tells us that the mag title is found on one page). Anyone with access to the book, please let us know what's there. Peridon (talk) 12:37, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:06, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:17, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete for lack of evidence of passing any of the WP:NJournals criteria. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:53, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.