Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathew Chuk (4th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus to delete following relisting. The Bushranger One ping only 23:40, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Mathew Chuk
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Delete. This page was previously kept after deletion reviews four years ago (first, second and third), however the article now fails to meet the notability requirements as set out in WP:POLITICIAN and WP:BIO1E. The article was retained due to the notability of events in 2007. Chuk's role was discussed specifically in one source and other sources are peripheral. There has been no response to article advice on the notability noticeboard for Mathew Chuk. Australian Matt (talk) 01:03, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: He was never notable, the rules on vanity bios like this one were just not well-developed or applied in the past.  Good luck to Mathew as a young litigator, let's remove the inevitable temptation for him to edit his own article before/if he does something worthy of notability.--Milowent • hasspoken  01:09, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Australian Matt (talk) 01:13, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Australian Matt (talk) 01:13, 26 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 01:47, 2 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, subject does not appear to pass WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 02:11, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, subject, in my opinion, does not pass WP:ANYBIO. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaldax (talk • contribs) 17:56, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.