Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathieu Ógan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   deleted as hoax (of some kind). Gwen Gale (talk) 09:24, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Mathieu Ógan

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Try as I might, I'm unable to verify a single thing in this walled garden of hoax articles, so let's delete the lot shall we? 2 lines of K 303  13:51, 18 June 2010 (UTC) Included in the nom are:


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete unverifiable. The Mathieu Ógan and Number Forty7 articles both link to Edgar West, which is also unverifiable and another possible hoax. snigbrook (talk) 21:13, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as bollocks. The articles in the Guardian and the Independent would be online and googlable if they existed. But they don't. "Why hath thou forsaken me" -- oh dear, our "artist" can't even manage the morphology of early modern English. (Bone up on it via the very first line of this.) Want some lonely-people-looking-lost art? Here you go. -- Hoary (talk) 14:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yep, it's thou hast, hath was an Elizabethan conjugation (of to have) for 3rd pers. sing. has. Gwen Gale (talk) 14:23, 20 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete, hoax. Gwen Gale (talk) 14:23, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. --John (talk) 17:15, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. Edward321 (talk) 02:54, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.