Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathieu van Bellen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 13:33, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Mathieu van Bellen

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Notability. This still-on-training young violinist, though I am sure he is very talented, hasn't made any impact in the classical music world and does not meet the notability criteria: I think this performer might be notable in the future, but he does not deserve an article now. Karljoos (talk) 09:57, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Hasn't been the subject of media coverage.
 * 2) Has made no recordings.
 * 3) Hasn't won a major competition. Yes, he was a contestant in the Menuhin and the Wieniawski Competition, but he did not make it to the finals. The Emily Anderson Prize is a scholarship and not a prize.
 * 4) Hasn't performed with a major orchestra as soloist.
 * 5) The list includes big names of people he has studied with but none of people performed with.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  --  The  left orium  10:21, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been notified to WikiProject Classical music - Voceditenore (talk) 11:28, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per the rationale of the nominator with no prejudice to re-creation if at a future time, this young artist becomes notable. I've done a search on the subject. There is no evidence of significant coverage in independent sources. The only appearance as a soloist with an orchestra appears to be with the Worcester Philharmonic Orchestra, an amateur group. Voceditenore (talk) 11:28, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for now and recreate later if he becomes notable. --Deskford (talk) 12:39, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. While he could well become notable, Wikipedia is not a WP:CRYSTALBALL and rherfore article shoudl not exist until something happens.--Peter cohen (talk) 13:37, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete maybe notable someday, but not today. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:51, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.