Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maths Doctor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 08:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Maths Doctor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Orphan; effectively an SPA. Wildly shy of GNG. Rayman60 (talk) 01:20, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Rayman60 (talk) 01:20, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Rayman60 (talk) 01:20, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Rayman60 (talk) 01:20, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Rayman60 (talk) 01:20, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:41, 11 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment The SPA aside, what about the Forbes and HuffPost articles? --Adamant1 (talk) 07:39, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm unsure this constitutes 'significant' - and curiously, the two Forbes and one huffpo blog post are all by the same author, suggesting a pseudo-independent PR tactic? Rayman60 (talk) 10:24, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Three articles in the Huffington Post and Forbes by "contributor" Andy Robertson, Family Gaming Expert on TV, Radio and blogger. "I've been set-up to try out a service in the UK called Maths Doctor" he writes. Did Forbes pay him and reimbursed the cost to maintain editorial independence? Doubtful. Forbes andthe Huffington Post  have no editorial oversight on their blogs. Vexations (talk) 13:16, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources. The three provided are bad as per the other comments about them. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:19, 13 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.