Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathtutor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Without WP:V sources, it does indeed read more like an advert than an encyclopedia article. No awards, no independent stories on it. Pigman ☿ 01:37, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Mathtutor

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Seems like an advert for a "Math tutoring system", which has no independent reliable sources. It also lacks on indication that this "math tutoring system" is noteworthy enough for an encyclopedic article. Its current state reads like a pamphlet, and I do not think it can be much more. The original other removed a prod that I added. undefinedUntil 15:42, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete no assertion of notability, reads like an advert Doc Strange (talk) 15:54, 26 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep This is one of the major UK developments in this area. It is NOT an advert. I am sorry if I made it sound like one. I have never understoos what "assertion of notablility" means - do you want me to put in the word "notabl"? (I have no probs doing that)
 * Johnbibby (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 16:53, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Please take a read of our notability guidelines. J Milburn (talk) 17:09, 26 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.   -- --  pb30 < talk > 18:57, 27 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.