Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matrikon Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 14:31, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Matrikon Inc.

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:CORP, WP:SPAM and WP:COI. Article was created by an WP:SPA account with no other edits other than related to Matrikon Inc. Was origionaly created as article Matrikon, which was deleted 6 (six) times, before being re-created again as Matrikon Inc. Which subsequently was deleted again as a WP:CSD Spam Article. "* This is one Part of a long history of Spam, promotion and abuse on Wikipedia by Matrikon Inc., see also -Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam" Has a few links but they seem to be press releases and merely trivial coverage or mentions. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. Seems to be nothing more than Self-promotion and Blatant advertising, which wikipedia is WP:NOT. Hu12 (talk) 13:31, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The references and external links establish that the company exists; it made a profit after a loss last year; was founded by a graduate from the University of Alberta and won some minor awards (none at a national level); has a minor partnership with that university; has an agreement with a company in India. This information does not establish notability; fails WP:CORP. Johnuniq (talk) 01:25, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 16:45, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 16:45, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Besides being a spam article, the sources don't show any actual significant coverage.  Triplestop  x3  00:21, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.