Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matrimandir Action Committee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 00:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Matrimandir Action Committee
Spam? Vanity? No third party sources? Something from all. Please delete, 2nd choice merge to Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet. --Pjacobi 20:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails to assert notability. scope_creep


 * Delete Fails to assert notability. --A. B. 06:54, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

I don't think I have ever used the term "CRUFT" before in an AfD discussion, but now I must say: CRUFT! CRUFT! CRUFT! What a tremendous amount of work for mere vanity articles that have no place in Wikipedia!! OfficeGirl 16:47, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * STRONG DELETE This article is one of a series of unsupported articles on non-notable subjects all in an apparent attempt to boost the credibility of one non-notable author. See the following:
 * Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet
 * The New Way, Volumes 1 & 2
 * The New Way, Volume 3
 * The Gnostic Circle
 * The Magical Carousel
 * Gnostic circle
 * The New Way (see Articles for deletion/The New Way)
 * Trivikrama
 * Aeon Center for Cosmology (see Articles for deletion/Aeon Center for Cosmology)
 * Aeon Group (see Articles for deletion/Aeon Group)
 * Sorry about all the exclamation marks. I guess I was taken aback by the extent of the articles created in this scheme.  I went ahead and made a mass AfD for the rest of these here: Articles for deletion/Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet(2nd nomination).  It is listed as a 2nd nomination because there was also a Category created for this author and someone tried to use the AfD process to delete the category.OfficeGirl 19:46, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.