Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Adler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 01:31, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Matt Adler

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable actor. Might be notable for his 1980s work, but I have not found any RS to support that. Natg 19 (talk) 17:56, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 17:56, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 17:56, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Looks like a pass of WP:NACTOR possibly on #1 and #3. See.--Jahaza (talk) 18:50, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: We need more than that LA Times source. That, in combination with maybe 2 or 3 others like it, would be enough probably. But that, combined with what's already at the article is short of what's needed. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - frequent yet minor roles, in particular several of them didn't even have a full name (such as Newscaster in Chronicle, a film I loved) and/or Redshirt (character) roles. Bearian (talk) 04:02, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:39, 30 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 02:58, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   06:17, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:56, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep A slight lack of sources but seems to pass WP:NACTOR. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 11:35, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep appears to pass Nactor, but I would remove the listings where he is just a "voice". That is non notable. L3X1 (distant write)  23:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- no significant accomplishments, supporting roles. The article does not offer encyclopedically relevant content, so I don't see any value to the project at this time. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.