Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Artisan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 02:21, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Matt Artisan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability per WP:BIO, with no significant coverage online from WP:RS, just lots of mentions on blogs about seduction tactics. Fails WP:NAUTHOR, as he's so far only written a self-published Kindle ebook with no claim of notability per WP:NBOOK and no significant coverage online from WP:RS. Won two awards from the "Dating World Summit", an organization I can't find online, and with no claim to notability. His sole claim to fame seems to be an 8 minute feature on his company on ABC Nightline last month. None of this amounts to a "widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field". Claims of running courses abroad for 7000+ participants are referenced by primary sources, and I can't find reliable secondary sources online to confirm them. His company (with the ABC reference) might be worth a mention in dating coach, but there's not enough here to merit a whole separate article about him. Norvoid (talk) 10:35, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Norvoid (talk) 10:36, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Norvoid (talk) 10:44, 7 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as it's noticeably not a joke since tagged it but I'm simply not seeing any better notability here even generally.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:22, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per Norvoid, the Nightline source is the only usable one, and it's not enough. Looking for more sources, I'm seeing heavy signs of aggressive self-promotion (which is unsurprising, considering) but nothing reliable. Someone who speaks German or trusts Google translate more than me can decide if this article is usable, but my tentative assessment is that it's not, and it does nothing to explain why he would be notable. Grayfell (talk) 01:22, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Norvoid ,fails WP:BIO.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:01, 14 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.