Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Bixel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep the subject of the article. Mailer Diablo 04:21, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Matt Bixel
A puff piece on a non-notable porn star; no reason to include this article on Wikipedia. Harr o 5 00:58, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. This guy seems to have pretty massive exposure per his IMDB page . Hence, seems to qualify per our many, many articles on porn stars. -- JJay 01:00, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per JJay. Roy  boy cr ash  fan  [[Image:Flag of Texas.svg|30px]] 01:15, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per JJay. --Ter e nce Ong 03:35, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per JJay. SorryGuy 07:17, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per JJay. Sheehan (Talk) 08:01, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep if voice actors in relatively unknown Anime shows get wikipedia pages, porn stars do too. --ReptileLawyer 15:48, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep it should be kept, but the article needs cleaning up
 * Copyvio Seems to be largely copy-and-pasted from this. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  21:23, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Not an original copyvio though. Looks like the copyvio section was pasted in with this diff on April 7 . Should be reverted back to the earlier diff. -- JJay 21:50, 14 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. A non-notable entry. The fact that he is listed on IMDB, which other Wikipedians often refer to as a 'vanity site', does not make him notable.--Jslasher 00:23, 18 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.