Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Bosher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Passes WP:GNG per sources from Cbl62. (non-admin closure) I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 06:18, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Matt Bosher

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NSPORTS and WP:GNG Vanadus (talk | contribs) 23:12, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - I found a few articles about him from The Palm Beach Post, but I'm not sure if it is enough for him to pass WP:GNG.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  00:41, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 04:35, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 04:35, 20 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Bosher was one of the best players in the nation at two different positions during his college career (K and P). Google News Archive has 931 articles for "Matt Bosher". Strikehold (talk) 04:46, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * See WP:GOOGLEHITS. The number of Google hits does not determine whether someone passes WP:GNG or not.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  05:10, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * It does not prove it, but it is strong evidence. See Cbl62's response below. Strikehold (talk) 16:05, 20 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Passes WP:GNG.  Has been the subject of non-trivial coverage in the mainstream article, and not just passing references in game coverage.  See ,,, , , , . Cbl62 (talk) 07:09, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:GNG per the sources found above.-- Giants27 ( T  |  C )  16:28, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Multiple all-conference selections as both a punter and kicker, plus significant coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. —Bagumba (talk) 01:20, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.