Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Bowen (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete, someone else decided it was a G6. James086 Talk &#124; Email 03:26, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Matt Bowen (disambiguation)

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Delete unnecessary page per MOS:DAB: The recommended practice in these situations is to place a hatnote on the primary topic article to link directly to the secondary topic. The primary has a hatnote to the only other entry, so this page serves no purpose. PROD was removed by anon as 'no primary', butt here was no further discussion. By page views and pages linked to it, Matt Bowen is correctly at primary page. Boleyn3 (talk) 19:11, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:10, 6 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: DAB is not necessary at this time as there is only one other name on it. The link at the primary page should be enough. GreyWyvern (talk) 17:11, 6 November 2009 (UTC)


 * It was tagged as a G6 speedy deletion but I decided that since the PROD was contested I would let this AFD run its course. I recommend deleting it anyway. James086 Talk &#124;  Email 18:44, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * What's so contestable about a G6? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * G6 "uncontroversial maintenance", I would call it controversial if someone has removed the PROD with a reason. That said, I'm not going to reverse the deletion just for the sake of bureaucracy. James086 Talk &#124;  Email 03:26, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.