Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Bullen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Withdrawn due to target mix-up. § FreeRangeFrog croak 01:56, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Matt Bullen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per OTRS#2014070710000993, the subject of the article has requested deletion. He contests that: Posting this at his request see below, no comment with regards to deletion or retention. Yunshui 雲 水 10:19, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * the article contains false information (no specifics given)
 * he has not given permission for his name to be used on Wikipedia
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:11, 12 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete A minor figure who lacks indepth coverage. The reasons given above though do not amount to reasons to delete. Wikipedia does not need a subjects permission to create an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:43, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep/NC without prejudice to renomination based on the new information from Yunshui. Thanks!  --j⚛e deckertalk 17:28, 14 July 2014 (UTC)  Comment It is a bit odd that this request originates from a person who is still linking to their Wikipedia biography on their official web site.    I lean delete *if* the request is genuine and not in error, while I think this person may meet our notability guidelines, I do not believe them to be so notable as to not be discretion zone for removal of biographies of living people on request by the subject. I agree with JPL, that we do not require permission for biographies on Wikipedia, and that false information is handled under our policies almost universally by normal editing, but I do think notability here is marginal. --j⚛e deckertalk 18:51, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note It appears that the OTRS requestor may actually have been referring to this userpage - which refers to a different individual with the same name - rather than the article. I have asked them for clarification. Yunshui 雲 水 13:27, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Definitely referring to the userpage, which I've now deleted. Since there is already a Delete !vote above this discussion cannot be speedily closed, however I think it's fair to say that the nominator has withdrawn their request for deletion. Yunshui 雲 水 13:36, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.