Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Conable (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  14:29, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Matt Conable
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Delete per ANYBIO and GNG. Not notable, no RS Dark Juliorik (talk) 09:54, 8 September 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:10, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:02, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:18, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. A Google search found no evidence of notability, just one-sentence mentions of the subject. The only lengthy piece was publicity written up on PR Web, which typically is posted by the subject. A search for awards came up empty. The subject appears to be a somewhat successful but non-notable business person. No WP:SIGCOV and the article coverage does not show that WP:BIO is met. Fails WP:GNG. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 06:24, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete agree with above. PR pieces and brief mentions, routine business person. Oaktree b (talk) 13:42, 22 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.