Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Dibley-Dias


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. RL0919 (talk) 19:19, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Matt Dibley-Dias

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails GNG, reads like a list of facts and does not prove notability JMHamo (talk) 19:15, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. JMHamo (talk) 19:15, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - I foudn sources like Neto de ex-jogador do Corinthians brilha na Inglaterra; seleções já sondam, New Zealand-born teenager on verge of breaking into English Premier League, All Whites secure promising Fulham midfielder Matt Dibley-Dias for October friendlies, and among many more sources. Young player with ongpoing career in Premier League club who has alreasdy been called up tp New Zealand senior national team. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 19:44, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football, England, New Zealand,  and Brazil.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  22:18, 3 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep - as above. This shouldn't really even be an AfD imho. Styx (talk) 04:19, 4 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:39, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Draft For me, I would need to see a little more for me, not far off know. Govvy (talk) 13:45, 4 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep but improve - An infobox should be added to the article. Jõséhola 06:36, 5 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Drafify - not currently notable, but might be in future. GiantSnowman 11:14, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, significant coverage that passes GNG.--Ortizesp (talk) 23:04, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. He does meet WP:GNG; per significant (non-trivial) coverage in the UOL article, this 2021 Stuff article, this 2023 Stuff article (Stuff is a reliable news website in New Zealand) and this NZ Herald article. It does feel a little bit as though it could be WP:TOOSOON (what if he gets another injury and his career sinks without a trace?) but on balance I think I'm persuaded that there is enough. Chocmilk03 (talk) 06:08, 9 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.