Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Ficner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 02:41, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Matt Ficner

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Yet another article created by the SPA people who brought Spellfury and created vanity articles for everyone associated with it. The sources here are trivial -- listings in user-edited IMDB, mentions on personal sites, etc. -- and do not show real world notability. There's nothing here to suggest this person deserves more than a sentence fragment in any article, and certainly not anything showing he deserves a full Wikipedia article. DreamGuy (talk) 15:35, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 15:42, 24 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep New sources have been added. This article appears to meet criterion #3 of WP:ARTIST. Please review the new additions and discuss further if there is still a violation of WP:N. Jusses2 (talk) 08:10, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per article improvements showing meeting WP:ENT, WP:CREATIVE, and WP:ANYBIO. Kudos to User:Jusses2 for the good work.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:29, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 1 October 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.