Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Fraser (psychic)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The sources put forward by GRuban were convincingly rebutted by Dom Kaos and LuckyLouie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:21, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Matt Fraser (psychic)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

From the minimal material in article, it seems subject is not WP:Noteable RobP (talk) 04:34, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 20:09, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete lack of coverage to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:38, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:GNG. "Find sources" finds sources. Lowell Sun; Orlando Sentinel; Fox 29 Philadelphia; DC Life Magazine; WPRI Rhode Island. It's enough. --GRuban (talk) 13:37, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:32, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 16:29, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 16:29, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala (talk) 17:00, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:49, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is just a brief article that does not say much, other than that this man has appeared on some programmes. Appearance on programmes is surely not enough to establish notability. Vorbee (talk) 07:45, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: none of the sources quoted above shows the depth of coverage required to demonstrate general notability: interviews with the subject of the article cannot be considered to be news coverage. Definitely fails WP:ENTERTAINER. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 14:07, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clear advertisement and directory page. 4 out of 7 reference links are dead. Of the three that are left, the first is an advertisement for a benefit that includes, Tickets are $40 plus cash bar, with a phone number for reservations. A blog talk radio reference, has the title Free Readings with Psychic Medium Matt Fraser!. At the bottom of the article it states Call His Office for Details. www.SimplyPsychic.com. The last reference is an Amazon link to buying the book or getting it on Kindle cheaper. There is just not enough notability to pass GNG. Otr500 (talk) 23:03, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I examined the sources helpfully provided by ﻿GRuban and found the majority are interviews that promote an upcoming event or appearance by Fraser, and so fall under WP:ROUTINE, i.e. "planned coverage of scheduled events, especially when those involved in the event are also promoting it". - LuckyLouie (talk) 17:59, 14 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.