Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Kroll


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Also, a number of other pages link to Matt Kroll in different contexts (as a CEO and as a scientist), so probably different people. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-02 08:33Z 

Matt Kroll

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

It does not really assert notability, and doesn't cite sources. --Hojimachongtalk 02:53, 25 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete under WP:V, no sources + no references + living person = no choice Alf photoman 17:27, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - as above, vanity --JBellis 19:09, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and maybe even Speedy under criterion A7? It doesn't assert any notability, and even calls their music "a complete bomb". Leebo 86 23:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with Leebo86 that this is a possible speedy, given that there are no obvious claims of notability. OhNo itsJamie Talk 05:03, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.