Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Malpass


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 02:08, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Matt Malpass

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a musician who might pass WP:NMUSIC if the article were properly sourced at all — however, as written the actual facts are all completely unsourced, with the only "references" present anywhere in the entire article being primary sources supporting personal quotes by individual people under the "accolades" section about how great he is to work with — which is not appropriate content for a Wikipedia article, violates WP:NPOV and edges the article dangerously close to being an advertisement rather than an encyclopedia article. I'm willing to withdraw this if real sources start showing up, but it's not entitled to stick around in this form. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 02:11, 21 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Only 5900 results including his own website and twitter.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 12:15, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 21 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete There seems to be nothing out there that isn't self-generated or from non-reliable sources. An impressive resume (although unsourced) but working on many musical projects does not confer notability unless there's some secondary coverage of it. § FreeRangeFrog croak 00:35, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.