Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Meadows


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Tawker 06:01, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Matt Meadows
Unverifiable Delete -Doc  ask?  22:17, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Has the person made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in the specific field? NO Rex the first  talk 23:01, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:V; also, Wikipedia articles are never written in the first or second person. B.Wind 23:21, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete We need some proof of this. --Dakart 23:22, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unverifiable, not notable if it were verified, and article author's record is questionable. Fan1967 00:00, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per User:Fan-1967. Suspect a hoax because of vandal warnings on User talk:Snort Master :) Dlohcierekim 03:49, 30 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.