Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Mullenweg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 21:37, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Matt Mullenweg

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

WordPress is notable, but is it's founder? Misterdiscreet 18:02, 31 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak keep and clean up. We might as well nominate Rasmus Lerdorf for deletion. Or Guido van Rossum. However, the current article (in particular, the links and the references) needs to be cleaned up, per WP:EL. --- Tito Pao 18:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. I also agree that references need cleaning up, though. —  Jeremy  Talk  01:32, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * weak keep The information does not duplicate the WordPress article, but I see nothing here that deals with anything except the precursors to WPress and related products. If there is no real information about him, the articles should be merged. DGG 03:03, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep and only weak because the article is not up to par. If WordPress is noatble so is its founder. Alf photoman 22:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. The work is very notable, the person however not at all. - -  ' twsx 'talk'cont'  16:20, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.