Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Nevarez (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The Bushranger One ping only 07:39, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Matt Nevarez
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable minor league baseball player. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BASE/N. No longer affiliated with team. Alex (talk) 12:57, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * He played in 2011 with the Astros farm system... Are you sure he isnt with them anymore? Even if he isnt he'll likely hook on with another team for 2012 and can be merged... you really shouldn't nominate people until they've been out of the game for a year. Spanneraol (talk) 13:26, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * He was released per Milb.com. Alex (talk) 13:34, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * In which case, we can't really make a determination on his status for 2012 one way or the other until the winter signing period starts. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 15:25, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Precisely. Unless he's hurt, he'll likely wind up in someone's organization by March, but likely not before February. I'd want some sort of holding pattern for now, or a nominator withdrawal pending further developments. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:22, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Putting this on hold seems to make sense for now. Rlendog (talk) 18:35, 17 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 24 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Since nobody has actually said it yet, and Alex hasn't withdrawn this one, I guess we should vote keep and prepare for a possible merge in the future. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:48, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per Muboshgu. Spanneraol (talk) 02:56, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.