Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Seager


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 01:42, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Matt Seager
Unverifiable see WP:V. Kappa 01:28, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * A Google search finds several different Matt Seagers, but none of them appear to be porn stars. Delete as per WP:V unless reliable sources are provided to verify the article.  --Allen3 talk 02:01, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 *  strong keep delete: article was just started. This appears to be a bad faith nomination because Kappa skipped a few step. One, add the Verify template. Two... Keep your cool. Three... comme back tomorow or in the next few days.  (And if you're not purely evil you will have given a notice to the user that started the page). ;) Comme back in a week. I've come back... changed my mind I have scene no attempt to ameliorate this article. It is unsourced. I now agree that it should be deleted. Even speedy delete. --CyclePat 02:04, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fairly obvious hoax.   dbtfz talk 02:07, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Note also that creator of the article, User:Hhmatt, is a vandal.  dbtfz talk 02:09, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing on IMDB -- Ruby  02:46, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Unverifiable, likely hoax. -- Kinu  t /c
 * Delete: per nom. —Wknight94 (talk) 12:09, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  15:26, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unverifiable. Since extensive attempts have been made at verifying it by several voters, that is unlikely to be fixed by waiting. Guy  18:58, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, while I usually procedurally keep new articles that get AfD'ed without a chance to develop, this one had at least enough time to cite a source or two, and didn't. Adrian~enwiki (talk) 20:03, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and dbtfz. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:49, 20 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.