Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Stoller (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:37, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Matt Stoller
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Reads like a resume, doesn't meet notability guidelines. Arbor8 (talk) 15:58, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * delete - no reliable sources. Ref 10 is even "^ "Page Not Found". ndnpac.org. Archived from the original on 2007-02-09. Retrieved 2007-02-27." William M. Connolley (talk) 18:29, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - setting aside the reliable sources issues (of which there are a number), the only claim to notability appears to be being past president of an organisation (MyDD) that itself doesn't appear notable. -- Deadly&forall;ssassin 22:48, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 22:10, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 22:10, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 22:10, 21 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Google News archive has tons of RS's evidencing subject's notability as a political activist and blogger--Weekly Standard, NY Times, salon.com, politico, The Atlantic, etc. I've added a couple to the page as references. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 03:49, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
 * comment notability coverage should be significant enough as to not require original research. The coverage in 2005 New York Times article is not substantial. A whole bunch of these snippets doesn't make for notability. Cantaloupe2 (talk) 12:08, 30 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect to MyDD Article reads like a resume. Arbor8 (talk) 14:50, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:59, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Delete The article references a whole bunch to subject's own work and pages. The subject-serving, fame creating nature of the article is quite obvious.  Cantaloupe2 (talk) 12:08, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:27, 5 October 2011 (UTC)




 * Merge / redirect to MyDD. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:34, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * delete fails WP:BIO for lack of in-depth coverage. LibStar (talk) 13:32, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP is not for posting résumé. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 12:44, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.