Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Tilley (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Cirt (talk) 00:06, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Matt Tilley
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Hack (talk) 11:43, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Edit summary from IP (original nominator): Nominated for deletion. This person is not worthy of an entry on wikipedia and the most of the links do not work. - 203.100.58.40 (talk) 15:46, 24 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep seem to be plenty of independent references including some reliable ones. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:55, 24 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - clearly notable - the subject has received non-trivial coverage from a number of reliable sources for radio and television work. Has three gold records (if that's worth anything).Hack (talk) 12:18, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - has had a number of albums that have charted & the albums have recieved ARIA sales certifications - as well as citing a number of indendent references. Dan arndt (talk) 01:12, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy/snowball keep after looking at the first AFD. Clearly notable. But please remove the fair-use images with no retionales! :) AnemoneProjectors (talk) 02:00, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep  YellowMonkey  ( vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll )  06:10, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - The links not working is not a valid reason to delete an article. Per all above, has charted and has been the significant subject of reliable sources. --Oakshade (talk) 04:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly notable radio personality. I am sceptical of the nominator's motives (the anon IP, not Hack) as there appears to have been a sustained campaign to delete this article. --Canley (talk) 00:18, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Indeed, it should be noted Hack voted Keep immediately below his procedural filing of the IP's nomination. Orderinchaos 03:17, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep He is notable (unfortunately). Orderinchaos 03:17, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.