Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Aaron Alexander


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Illumibowl. joe deckertalk 22:03, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Matthew Aaron Alexander

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While Illumibowl may be marginally notable, having gotten notice at Engadget and CNET, the designer/promoters don't appear to have any independent notability, or at least aren't "world renowned business experts."  Acroterion   (talk)   01:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: See also Articles for deletion/Michael Kannely.


 * Delete. Both creators don't appear to have independent notability from their invention. As such, both their pages should be deleted, or at least redirected to Illumibowl. JudgeRM  15:54, 8 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:54, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:54, 16 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge to Illumibowl, which will enhance that article. This is also functional as a valid search term for a redirect. North America1000 00:54, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete entirely as there's nothing at all actually convincing as to why keep this and also keep as vulnerable to premature restarting or anything else to suggest against consensus. There's nothing at all to suggest he will anytime soon have his own independent notability and is clearly only best known for that Illumibowl, thus nothing convincing to keep the minimal pieces of content here. SwisterTwister   talk  18:15, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Illumibowl. I'm not sure if there's anything worth merging, but the history would be in tact if someone wants to merge something. -- Tavix ( talk ) 22:16, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.