Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Beall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:33, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Matthew Beall

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No real assertion of notability in the article itself, and the cited links appear to be self-promotional sites. Unless notability otherwise established, delete. --Nlu (talk) 21:00, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:53, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:53, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:53, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:53, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:53, 24 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence at all of notability, let alone against anything in WP:ARTIST. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gilgongo (talk • contribs) 17:36, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 17:14, 31 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete: I can find sourced coverage of various people named Matthew Beall, but of this one the nearest to substantial is this blog interview. Fails WP:ARTIST. AllyD (talk) 20:10, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.