Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Camp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:19, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Matthew Camp

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a person whose claims of notability are not properly referenced to reliable or notability-supporting sources. Five of the eight footnotes here are to blogs, making them total non-starters in terms of establishing notability at all -- and while there are three sources that are more reliable titles in theory, two of the them (Huffington Post and Instinct) are Q&A interviews in which he's talking about himself in the first person, while the third (Attitude) just glancingly mentions his name in the context of being the cover model rather than actually saying anything substantive about him. As always, appearing on the cover of a magazine is not in and of itself an automatic inclusion freebie that exempts a person from actually having to get over WP:GNG on the sourcing -- but a person doesn't get over GNG if you have to rely entirely on blogs and Q&A interviews and can't show any third-party third-person journalism. Bearcat (talk) 16:24, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:28, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:29, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:29, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:29, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:29, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:30, 29 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.