Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew E. Gibson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedily delete as "blindingly obvious and nonsalvageable nonsense" (and WP:SNOW. JDoorj a m    Talk 04:08, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Matthew E. Gibson
Obvious hoax and nonsense, but the article It does make some assertions of notability, so perhaps a speedy deletion would not be appropriate here. (Not that I would object, obviously.) Captain Disdain 01:29, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, obviously. -- Captain Disdain 01:29, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete I can't think of what speedy criteria it meets, but it has to meet something. Why is "obvious hoax" NOT a CSD? -- Kicking222 01:45, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Honestly, I don't know what I was thinking -- I just reread the article and whatever serious-looking stuff I imagined I saw there most definitely only exists in my imagination. I put it up for speedy deletion, and good goddamn riddance... I can't imagine it not being speedily deleted as blindingly obvious and nonsalvageable nonsense. Sorry to waste your time. =) -- Captain Disdain 01:49, 1 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.