Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Hartman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. – Alphax &tau;&epsilon;&chi; 07:48, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Matthew Hartman
Vanity article for a Community School teacher. (Kind of cute though.)  freshgavin TALK  11:01, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. As per nomination.  freshgavin TALK  11:02, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Deletion questionable no harm no foul (anon edit by 68.100.150.179 - --Pyroclastic 04:05, 24 October 2005 (UTC))
 * Delete. Almost the same as the Joe Bloggs example in the policy WP:VAIN. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 12:48, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * please don't delete this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.134.145.242 (talk • contribs) 15:11, 21 October 2005
 * Delete or Speedy though he sounds like a nice guy. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 16:41, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 'No delete' who cares what Joe bloggs thinks anyway (anon edit by 68.100.150.179 - --Pyroclastic 04:05, 24 October 2005 (UTC))
 * Delete per nom. If only all students thought highly enough of their teachers to write an encylopedia article about them. --Holderca1 18:50, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keepthis entry
 * Speedy delete as per WP:CSD A7. Hall Monitor 21:43, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as (unintentional) vanity, but still cute. The kids deserve an A for effort. - Sensor 23:59, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above --Pyroclastic 04:05, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete does not apear to be a one-edit article. (anon edit by 68.100.150.179 - --Pyroclastic 04:05, 24 October 2005 (UTC))
 * No deletion pretty funny (anon edit by 68.100.150.179 - --Pyroclastic 04:05, 24 October 2005 (UTC))
 *  It's not vain if you follow a strict interpratation of this Joe blogg fellow's rules (unsigned comment by 68.100.150.179. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 08:43, 24 October 2005 (UTC))
 * No reason to delete For saving it don't delete this article
 * Don't Delete This is an informative article about matthew hartman. I feel that we should be able to learn things about as many people as we can.  By deleting this, you are crushing everything that wikipedia stands for.
 * Delete (reluctantly) - Aaaw, it's really touching. but sorry we can't have everybody writing about their teachers on Wikipedia.  this is soo much nicer than the usual garbage though :-)  -- M a d i s on 13:57, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

It would be destroying the ideals that wikipedia is based on to delete this but I do think there should be some qualifications needed to edit intelectual articles. I respect you all and I can understand the frustration of looking up "hartman" and finding this, but now that it's based purely on fact (for GWer's I still saved the "chronicles") I hope you'll take it under consideration to keep it living. - J.M.
 * For example, proof of ability to spell "intellectual"? Barno 19:21, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I edited it so it's strictly factual; 


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.