Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Horrell

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Rje 00:44, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)

Matthew Horrell
Not notable. Delete. utcursch 05:15, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Name gets 5 google hits, none of them referring to a student film maker. No mention on IMDB. Not notable. Delete. Mgm|(talk) 08:58, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Independent film makers need to have had their films widely distributed (US ones at least nationally, preferably internationally, with a reasonable number of screens) or have won a prize at a major independent film festival to warrant an article. No evidence of remotely approaching that here. Average Earthman 13:25, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable. - Mailer Diablo 13:31, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Up and coming filmmakers should have pages so people can follow thier progress
 * Above vote was added by the author of the article. utcursch 06:08, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable, possible concealed vandalism. Agriculture 04:48, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC) - Note to the above, you need to sign your post for it to count.
 * Delete, not notable - 5 Google hits, possible vanity. Megan1967 06:17, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as vanity. "Thier" sockpuppet doesn't help, y'know. :^) - Lucky 6.9 17:07, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)