Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew J Gunn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 07:16, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Matthew J Gunn

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Nothing indicating fulfillment of WP:BIO. Neither of the movies or books he's made have articles, so they wouldn't, it seem, imply notability. Prod was contested. - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 09:15, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - no notability as an author as both books were published with so-called vanity presses. Screenplays do appear on imdb, but I don't know enough about how imdb works to pass judgement on them. Readro (talk) 11:11, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * In my experience, IMDB is rather un-picky, so generally a useless indicator of notability. - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 12:31, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete I searched various places and can't find anything about this person or their works, other than to confirm that they exist. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:44, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no reliable sources to establish notability. Note that the books he has published are through Authorhouse and Lulu which are print on demand services. -- Whpq (talk) 18:30, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I know for a fact that he has several projects on the run, one of which involves a well known young talent which should be of good interest to you and people in general. I can safely say that his page will have expanded significantly by next year so even if you do delete it now, you'll just be making a new one later on. Comedyinput (talk) 00:21, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Your personal knowledge isn't a reliable sources, and speculation about the future doesn't justify an article now. -- Whpq (talk) 03:30, 28 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.