Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew K. Wynia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) f  e  minist  06:42, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Matthew K. Wynia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual -- there's an evidently insufficient body of secondary sources to justify an article. He appears to be requesting deletion, as well:. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 11:54, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Yeah. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:42, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nominator. Came across this page at WP:BLPN. Meatsgains (talk) 16:01, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 18:41, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 18:41, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 18:41, 19 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep I have rewritten and expanded the article with better sources. He has a solid h-index of 32, and is the director of a major bioethics center at the University of Colorado. He has also received a chapter award from the American College of Physicians, which honors people with "a long history of excellence and peer approval in the specialty of Internal Medicine." And he's a fellow of the ACP as well. I think these facts demonstrate that Wynia meets WP:PROF criteria 1 and 3. Everymorning (talk) 20:14, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   20:21, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per WP:PROF (7 publications with >100 citations each in Google scholar). Presidency of the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities is also suggestive, although I'm not sure that society is big enough (1800 members) for heading it to be automatically notable. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:19, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Easily passes WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:44, 19 May 2017 (UTC).

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:30, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: Passes WP:PROF. SL93 (talk) 00:53, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.