Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Riley (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus  DGG ( talk ) 23:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Matthew Riley
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nearly G4 material too and I would've also PROD too as there's nothing here actually suggesting the needed solid independent notability and my searches have found nothing better at all. After deleting, I suggest Redirecting to the likely search of Matthew Reilly. This is also another case where the author was only ever active to this one article. Notifying past user who made several changes. SwisterTwister  talk  06:53, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 28.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 07:11, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nondescript corporate puffery. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:14, 28 May 2016 (UTC).

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yellow Dingo (talk) 01:52, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If redirected, this should go to Matt Riley. Peter James (talk) 22:46, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete article on a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.