Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Russell (producer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:52, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Matthew Russell (producer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSIC. I suggest we merge it with the band's article as there's no coverage on him to guarantee a standalone article. All the refs in the article at the moment have nothing to do with the subject, two of them are dictionary definitions of words, one says nothing about the subject. Less Unless (talk) 13:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 13:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 13:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:06, 7 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. The subject fails to establish WP:GNG and seems to have been written as WP:PROMO. The article cites primary sources which are unreliable and need reliable sources. Abishe (talk) 13:39, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, not enough RS to be found. Caro7200 (talk) 14:10, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG twerk (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:13, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete and then Redirect to Cheat Codes (DJs). Best, GPL93 (talk) 12:36, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. The subject fails WP:MUSICBIO and has not received reliable in-depth coverage.  Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 16:05, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:GNG and WP:MILL. It has been clear consensus for several years now that producers are run of the mill, and thus not automatically notable, absent independent and significant coverage in reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 01:06, 15 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.