Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew S. Johnson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:45, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Matthew S. Johnson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Academic notability Operator873 CONNECT 03:06, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 05:03, 14 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep passes WP:Prof with 2000+ citations in GS. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:55, 14 October 2017 (UTC).
 * Keep with over 200 publications and a book, sees to be worthy of an article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:40, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:56, 15 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep I feel wikipedia needs to appriciate people in science more. We are creating Wiki page for a 17 years old teenage who is playing football in a region league in a random country, why not a wikipedia page for someone who have had a big contribution in scientific fields of climate change, air pollution control and etc. He has five patents in air pollution control only, I guess he deserve to have a wikipedia page. I added some more references for his results. best. Aerospc (talk) 08:59, 16 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.