Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Sullivan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete as a non-notable biography, WP:BIO refers.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   12:38, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Matthew Sullivan
Non-noteable, possible vanity, definite hoax article. Article was PROD'd previously but removed by the author with no explanation. Ataricodfish 18:45, 25 August 2006 (UTC) I thought this was a free place to write on things and just because this cult has no "Google" hits does not make it untrue. The Cult i speak about is very true. This isnt vanity, I do not know this guy personally.Rediculous the way you all act around here. Nobel1
 * Delete, inventor of religion that gets zero google hits. Weregerbil 19:05, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - ot at all verifiable, and most likely a hoax. -- Whpq 19:15, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Strong Delete religioncruft from vandals. Danny Lilithborne 19:32, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep unlike you guys i understand that just because somethings not in google doesnt mean it doesnt exist (69.69.160.132 00:31, 28 August 2006 (UTC))
 * Comment Wow, your vandalism has changed my mind. Danny Lilithborne 00:43, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NFT 2Ghits for "Sullinarianism", both of which wiki. Appears to be a non-notable concept from a nn person. Ohconfucius 09:57, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.