Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Willetts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 01:11, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Matthew Willetts

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Pretty demonstrably non-notable consultant. Fails WP:BASIC and WP:BLP. I'd probably just look at WP:SNOWBALL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Legis (talk • contribs) 10:40, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2011 December 12.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  17:36, 12 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. I don't see the notability here, nor can I find sources to document what notability is there. IMDB does not qualify as a reliable source, nor do websites that just list contact information. Even with additional sourcing, we probably need a rewrite. That said, it's bad form to call for a Snowball close before a single comment has been made. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 18:23, 12 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. This fairly detailed resume seems non-notable on the face of it, and I can find nothing in web searches to suggest otherwise. Social media, primary sources, directory listings, and trivial mentions only, at least for this Matthew Willets. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 18:34, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.