Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthias Garten


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 23:40, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Matthias Garten

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. WP:BLP, with significant advertorial overtones, whose only substantive claim of notability is as an expert in PowerPoint presentations. There's literally no evidence here of any reliable source coverage about him in sources that are genuinely independent of his own self-published self-promotion; the references are entirely to primary sources (such as his own company's website, the websites of organizations and conferences he was a direct participant in, and press releases), unreliable blogs and Amazon sales pages for his own books. This is not the kind of sourcing it takes to get someone over WP:GNG just for being CEO -- even his company wouldn't qualify for a Wikipedia article under WP:CORP on the basis of sources like these, let alone its CEO separately qualifying for a BLP just because he's a CEO. Bearcat (talk) 23:43, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:29, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:29, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * delete per nom what the - David Gerard (talk) 15:54, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:06, 22 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as spam for creatively named "Chief Presentation Officer (CPO)". Nothing but a marketing brochure. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:40, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.