Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matty Midura


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Owen&times; &#9742;  00:46, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Matty Midura
His claim to notability seems to be his "#1 Rated Website" about shark attacks in New Jersey. But alas, Alexa has not heard of it yet, and Google has only 400 hits. No Google news either. JoaoRicardo 19:59, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &mdash; RJH 15:45, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

What? Whois marking this article (about) 'Matty Midura' for deletion above?? I am Matty Midura actually - and I have 'no problem' with it, as presented by anonymous user as it appears, and from another 'identical post' from Candice666 found via 'User Talk' or something. I found 'both' accidentally, while researching my name (i.e. Matty Midura) within this upstart publication.
 * SAVE!!!

Moreover! Just who-n-f#ck is this 'spic' (JoaoRetardo) anyway?? He/she, is going to question "how my sites are listed" in search engines??? The same goes for the 'dork' (RJH) below the Ist. asshole! I will provide a 'link/photo' of how one of my sites (i.e. New Jersey Shark Attacks) was/are ranked by Google (previously #1) and by Yahoo below here - if it's permissible. I am a 'new user' here, not yet up to speed with the format and rules of this publication! The same sentiments apply to the 'dork' below the Ist. asshole!

Lastingly! I must admit, I am flattered that someone posted an article about me in Wikipedia. I originally thought that the publication 'searched the web' or, by other means (i.e. Public Records etc.) for info posted. Obviously, it was 'other means' but, that of the public at large! I'm into that, as long as the info is not intrusive or defamatory! In my '8 years' on the Web, I've seen it all. But I am 'curious' as to how the poster (i.e. Candice666), or anyone for that matter, could possibly discern or otherwise: "that I did not graduate from LaSalle U, and not return to complete the exams!" The university would never divulge that kind of information - about the exams specifically, and/or whether I choose to re-test or decline to do so on record!.. IMAGES ABOUT #1 RATED SHARK ATTACK SITE Google Yahoo


 * Above added by . JoaoRicardo 18:49, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * It is not being discussed wether Matty Midura exists, or wether he approves of the article, or wether the article was created by himself or some admirer. What is being discussed is Matty Midura's notability. If you think Midura has done something that makes him worth of being on Wikipedia, please show it here. Ranking 1st on a Google search is not convincing evidence, since any site can show 1st on Google if the search is worded with that intention in mind. And please do not remove votes from this message. This accomplishes nothing and will most likely get you blocked for violating Wikipedia policies. Thank you. JoaoRicardo 18:49, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. non-notable.-- Dak ota   t   e  16:58, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. NN-bio. Only 76 unique Google hits for "Matty Midura". That his homepage is on Geocities doesn't help matters. Not only that, but he's a jerk (not that that's a criteria for deletion, but I'm not going to do him any favors). howcheng   [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 18:32, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * DELETE --LifeStar 19:34, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete - NN possibly vanity. Breaches of WP:NPA or WP:-( don't help matters at all. --LBMixPro&lt;Sp e ak 19:47, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete NN --pgk( talk ) 19:48, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, incomprehensible nonnotable bio. And since I'm such a nice guy, I'm just putting this thing here to get insulted. Baah! Nobody insults me! --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 19:54, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete NN. D-Rock 21:23, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete NNNNNN. Ashibaka tock 20:50, 16 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.