Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matubhuiyan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep - consensus is that WP:5P applies as the subject is a verifiable settlement. (non-admin closure)  Gongshow  Talk 04:55, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Matubhuiyan

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.  Cliff  Smith 17:37, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.  Cliff  Smith 17:37, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

WP:NOTDIRECTORY, or WP:NOTGUIDE. Doesn't effectively demonstrate significance. Unable to locate any reliable sources to add potential historical/encyclopedic information; perhaps some exist in Bengali language texts? Zujua (talk) 08:31, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * We have invariably, for a good few years, kept articles about verifiable human settlements. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:37, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh I see, thank you for that; sounds keepable to me. In its original state, I thought it was referring to a bazaar rather than a village.  Can I count that as a "Keep" vote from you?  Shall I withdraw the nomination?  Zujua (talk) 06:18, 23 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 04:23, 23 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep as a verifiable settmement; Wikipedia is a gazzeteer as one of the pillars. - The Bushranger One ping only 02:03, 24 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep – Per Wikipedia's Five pillars, the encyclopedia also exists as a gazetteer. Also keep per Notability (geography). Northamerica1000(talk) 03:31, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.