Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maturi Venkata Subba Rao Engineering College


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Osmania University.  Sandstein  10:09, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Maturi Venkata Subba Rao Engineering College

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Page was created by a SPA. Ref section is missing sources. No RS online. Org not notable. Vikram Vincent 15:16, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 15:16, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 15:16, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 15:16, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: fails WP:GNG. Poppi fied  talk 03:10, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced and written like an advert. BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV, addressing the subject directly and indepth (there are database style listings and mentions, but nothing that meets SIGCOV). The info in the article is taken from the school website or is original research.  // Timothy :: talk  07:08, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources fails in WP:GNG. Citterz (talk) 10:08, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Osmania University: because the college belongs to this University. Alcremie (talk) 12:46, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect to Osmania University. Either way the sourcing doesn't live up to what is needed for the notability guidelines. Let alone WP:NORG. I'm neutral on if it should be deleted or redirected though. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:35, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Osmania University: Affiliation to the university is verifiable and a plausible search term. -- Ab207 (talk) 12:45, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Accredited, degree-awarding tertiary institution, which consensus has been to keep. We do not redirect to the university to which it is affiliated; it is not a part of that university. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:05, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Its a private college. They don't get a special pass from the notability guidelines. There's zero consensus that private schools do. Adamant1 (talk) 12:56, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Not sure where you get that from. We have never treated private colleges any differently from public ones. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:NSCHOOL All universities, colleges and schools, including high schools, middle schools, primary (elementary) schools, and schools that only provide a support to mainstream education must either satisfy WP:ORG, general notability guideline, or both. For-profit educational organizations and institutions are considered commercial organizations and must satisfy those criteria.'''" --Adamant1 (talk) 23:56, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * COMMENT Considering that is using a WP:IDHT approach is not productive. Talking about a past consensus without any basis in the present is not helpful either because it goes against  and the guideline of WP:NSCHOOL, which was the basis of my AFD nomination. I think it is best we just ignore this !vote across all AFDs since they have zero data to share to the discussion.  Vikram Vincent 11:21, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Basically, what you're saying is that opinion of an experienced editor who has participated in hundreds of these AfDs and is pointing out that consensus is on his side should be discounted just because you disagree with that consensus and would like to see it discounted? Well done! -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:57, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * It's cool! I'll stick with the guidelines and base my nominations on that :-) Let's agree to disagree and end the back and forth? Vikram Vincent 14:54, 20 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.