Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maulana Sufi Mufti Azangachhi Shaheb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep - Closing as Keep as all has been improved (Thanks everyone) and the Speedy Delete is pretty much a WP:IDONTLIKEIT argument but either way clear keep here. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 16:30, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Maulana Sufi Mufti Azangachhi Shaheb

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreliable and self referenced. Promotional tone. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 18:31, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 15 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep I have removed the puffery. Someone from a previous century in a book would count as notable. Certainly the referencing could be improved. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:48, 16 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete : Referenced book is a sloppy self published work \partisan work without any credibility or popularity. No other secondary sources present, seems to be written like a fan page with many honorifics.Summichum (talk) 07:50, 17 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep -Per and I've added few references in the article.  Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  08:35, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as per — CutestPenguinHangout 09:14, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep -The References has been modified. Now It should not be deleted. Nijam122 11:45, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.