Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maurício Abreu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. If the article has issues that can be correctly framed in policy, then there is no prejudice against a renomination, but otherwise, Unscintillating makes a very good point. The Bushranger One ping only 02:00, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Maurício Abreu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject lacks notability and there are no mainstream references that suggest wider influence. Contaldo80 (talk) 08:19, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. While I see his books on Google books, they are lacking info on publisher (self-published?) and I don't see any citations. Seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR. That said maybe someone can find better sources that are not in English; do ping me if there are more arguments so I can reconsider my vote. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:42, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:21, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:21, 16 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep I will advise the previous user to take a look about Maurício Abreu publishing houses.Mistico (talk) 00:44, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * What does this mean (or indeed prove?) Contaldo80 (talk) 08:24, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:41, 23 October 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Procedural close The second snippet from WP:BEFORE D1 Google books is the book Geographers: Biobibliographical Studies, and states, "Numerous events were held in honour of Mauricio Abreu, and tributes paid after his death".  I think it might be a different Abreu, but since the nomination doesn't mention it, there was obviously no WP:BEFORE reporting done here.  The nomination also fails to make the WP:BEFORE report that there is an article on the Portuguese Wikipedia.  Nomination also seems to think that Wikipedia requires "mainstream" references and topics must have had "wide influence".  There is no point in putting in time on a topic when the nominator hasn't established a problem that needs attention, especially when the sources are in Portuguese.  Unscintillating (talk) 14:45, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:51, 30 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.