Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mauricio Ramos (businessman) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 20:59, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Mauricio Ramos (businessman)
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. Last Afd was corrupt.  scope_creep Talk  14:01, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:10, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:10, 13 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - undisclosed paid-for spam. The last AFD was heavily influenced by Sockpuppet investigations/SpareSeiko and other UPE editors and should be disregarded. MER-C 12:20, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * AFD is not cleanup. We only do votes here on the basis of notability. Being a CEO of nearly fortune 500 company is a very big notable achievement. Wrenaudra (talk) 15:29, 18 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - there isn't sufficient coverage of this person (as opposed to the company they head) to warrant a discrete article. ƒirefly  ( t · c ) 12:48, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I would advise to check the sources like Forbes, CNN, WSJ and many others. They are enough to qualify for GNG. Wrenaudra (talk) 15:29, 18 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. We have seen enough UPE and AFD manipulation for this article. MarioGom (talk) 18:26, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Please modify your vote with proper reasoning here instead of policy guidelines. This is AFD not noticeboard discussion. Wrenaudra (talk) 15:29, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * No. If you think there are enough reliable sources, feel free to bring them up. MarioGom (talk) 19:11, 18 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep CEO of a quite big company Millicom which have more than 55 millione customer. As per in last AFD also pointed that there are more than enough sources to make him pass for GNG. Not sure why it got nominated again despite the lasted AFD. Sources like Forbes, CNN, TD Ameritrade Network, Wall Street Journal are WP:RS and are way more than enough to make him qualify for GNG. Wrenaudra (talk) 15:24, 18 April 2021 (UTC) — Wrenaudra (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * WSJ? No, this is part of a business directory. It does not establish notability. There seems to be not enough reliable sources to establish notability independently of Millicom. MarioGom (talk) 19:10, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant coverage or notability. Also, can't force notability, as the socks have tried in the past on this guy.  GenQuest  "scribble" 16:55, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, redirect to Millicom and fully protect the redirect. Regardless of the size of the bludgeon that is being swung by the socks in this article's obit, it is and remains undisclosed paid-for spam about a non-notable individual. Any potential future recreations should go through AfC. Blablubbs&#124;talk 14:07, 19 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.