Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maurizio Porfiri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Article's been improved since nomination & overall consensus is to keep (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 23:18, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Maurizio Porfiri

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The references lack WP:DEPTH I don't think these references establish notability they mostly cover just one publication. So said The Great Wiki Lord. (talk) 22:16, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 13 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. His robotic fish research (is that the "one paper" mentioned?) has been reported in the Daily Mail, the New York Times, in French and Indian newspapers, Wired, Popular Science, and on and on. Some of his other work has also been widely reported. A scientist whose research meets the general notability guideline is notable. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 21:27, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep, significant coverage of him and his work in numerous publications in English, French and Italian. I added two more citations to the article to show more depth. --Bejnar (talk) 01:10, 17 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.