Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maurizio Valtieri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete as a non-notable, vanity-press author; zero Google News Ghits. Bearian (talk) 20:25, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Maurizio Valtieri

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The only claims to notability are some plays written by him (but the nearest thing to a review is, which is apparently just a local announcement - it gives show times and ticket prices) and a single published novel, for which only personal websites, or sites not mentioning it, are given. It seems that it is self-published through lulu.com (the site is blacklisted but the page is : (...)/content/517623). For what is worth, the corresponding article in Italian Wikipedia has been deleted. Goochelaar (talk) 17:44, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Scrivo in italiana, visto che chi propone la cancellazione è madrelingua italiana. Sono state chieste prove che lo scrittore che gli spettacoli citati non siano lettera morta, ma qualcosa di rappresentato. La cosa è stata fatta, nel modo possibile (visto che non si possono caricare le immagini degli articoli e di tutte le recensioni, come era stato fatto, per problemi di copyright. Nell'era di internet, la maggior parte delle segnalazioni e discussioni sull'autore sono in rete, ma non si può perché è pubblicità personale etc. Insomma si è fatto il possibile, consapevoli che non si stava parlando di Shakespeare. Su wikipedia, specialmente quella in italiana ci sono voci che riguardano attori sconosciuti apparsi mezza volta in una puntata mai vista dalla gente. L'impressione generale è che, nonostante l'enciclopedia sia "libera" (questo non vuol dire scrivere la qualunque, ma se non si scrivono oscenità o palesi falsità o scemenze o voci offensive, non si vede dove sia il problema), il tutto sia in balia di "controllori" zelanti a seconda dell'umore, altrimenti non si capirebbe come ci siano voci (di cui nessuno propone la cancellazione) assolutamente inutili. Detto questo (lo sfogo è dovuto all'inutilità di ogni tentativo di adeguarsi alle "regole"), mi scuso se sono un po' stanco di essere politicamente corretto e ti prego di perdonare i toni. Se proprio è necessario essere pubblicati (magari a pagamento) da Feltrinelli, per avere "rilevanza enciclopedica", beh, fate un po' come ve pare (stai a Roma, capisci il romano, no?). Grazie ancora, Smiwave —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.224.230.145 (talk) 14:38, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:33, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

I do not agree with deletion/Maurizio Valtieri Smiwave —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.224.230.145 (talk) 14:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC)


 * For those who don't understand Italian: The article creator is agitated about the article being nominated for deletion and argues that although the encyclopedia is free, there are "controllers" deciding what should be included. Admiral Norton (talk) 22:46, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, seresin ( ¡? ) 07:14, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: per nom; no evidence of reliable sources.  RGTraynor  08:31, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Borderline. Probably notable, but needs a good Internet source first. Admiral Norton (talk) 22:45, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Go to Google Books, go to Google News & Archive, go to Google, try different keywords, and when sources are not online go to your local fucking library and read them. Make it work, because authors don't need people kicking them around after all the hard hours they have spent getting their words just right. Sincerely, Manhattan Samurai (talk) 20:48, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Samauri, I did some work and while i certainly verified everything, I still failed to find any evidence of Notability.--CastAStone//₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€ 13:14, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.